Loading…
TOOL CENTER
Which passage is yours? Pick a tab and see only your leg — from the path chain to the flagship tools, each grounded in your profile and real data.
I · DIRECTION & METHOD
Jumping straight to professors with a fuzzy direction makes every conversation hollow.
From your interests, background and coursework, AI shapes clear keywords, a question and fitting methods — get this right and advisor choice and the plan stand firm.
I'm curious how information on social media shapes young people's spending.
↓ ✦ AI · direction & method
II · ADVISOR · SCHOOLS
Picking an advisor shouldn't mean forum rumors and needle-in-a-haystack.
Match your direction and interests against 280K researchers' papers, grants and recent moves — a reach/fit/safe ladder, each with a reason.
III · READ & PREPARE
Requirements, deadlines and documents scattered across each school's PDFs.
Paste the guidelines or a URL; AI extracts key dates, easy-to-miss eligibility, and the must-arrive vs postmark distinction. Confirm, then file the school, document to-dos and timeline in one tap. The countdown planner works back from the deadline to each document's latest start date, reserving mailing buffer when arrival is required.
出願期間：1月10日〜1月24日 / 筆記試験：2月12日 / 口述試問：2月13日 / 合格発表：2月20日…
↓ ✦ AI parse · dates
IV · STATEMENT
Before you submit, no one tells you why it reads like a template.
Draft grounded in your target school and advisor, then review paragraph by paragraph — anchored to the lab's concrete topic, with reasons and fixes.
My reason for this lab is to deepen my undergraduate study of ○○ into the specific question of △△…
Too vague — anchor to Tamura's topic: cite his 2024 “Disclosure & matching-market efficiency” and say what you'd build on his mechanism design.
V · RESEARCH PLAN
A generic research plan moves no specific advisor.
Custom-draft from your target advisor's recent research, grants and record — the framing, method and feasibility they care about; then review across eight dimensions and format to JP convention.
↓ ✦ Grounded · custom draft
VI · OUTREACH · FOLLOW-UP
Mass emails vanish; handwriting each loses track of who's where.
Craft each email from public academic data—why this advisor and what you want to build on—then track every contact and reply in one follow-up view.
VII · EXAM · INTERVIEW
You reach the exam and interview only to find no one told you what's on them.
Organize your major's written subjects into an actionable plan; then generate likely Q&A from your plan and school, and rehearse until natural.
Belongs to no single leg, useful on every one: SPI, Tamatebako, IT Passport, driving exam… real drills + mocks + review book.
Dates from guidelines, emails and notices — paste to add; every tool's schedule flows into one line — applications, exams, interviews, results, all counting down.
Open my timelineAdmissions or job-hunt, when people usually do what — see the standard rhythm, then build yours: early where it counts, calm elsewhere.
See the standard timeline →REAL DATA — 830+ schools / 280,000+ researchers / 30,000,000+ academic records / 1,000+ company analyses · traceable